~ 2016 July sea ice action has remarkably steady Gyre flows and North Atlantic "breathing" ice front
NASA EOSDIS last few days demonstrating rapid Melting in the Western North American sector of the North Pole, flowing through Fram Strait, and remarkable "breathing" sea ice at the North Atlantic Front, likely again due to displacement of sea ice towards open water melting rapidly. WDJuly 15,2016
Friday, July 15, 2016
Tuesday, July 12, 2016
Illusions 2016 melt season: The bigger Arctic Gyre appears steady despite winds trying to stop it
~ Fram Strait still has steady incoming ice as well.
There is a lot of talk about how dominant Arctic Ocean winds, in some large part opposite to clockwise Arctic Ocean Gyre, "was not favourable" for compaction, gave a "lackluster performance" in June and therefore the melt season is basically "dull".... and especially melt ponds are not numerous. NASA ever so potent and a hugely positive force for correct science, projects
a large sea ice extent to remain Mid-September. But will that happen?
JAXA captured intense activities, despite apparently a "slow June", if you look very carefully, there was a larger Gyre North of Alaska somehow turning ice clockwise, with a classic motion compaction, opening water more and furthering the melting process. Another panhandle of slower melting ice is already in place, about Wardle Island, the now often appearing Laptev "bite" precedes a huge broken up ice field further North. Ice is receding on every front. Except Fram Strait which has a net output of sea ice.
From here , we clearly observe that the Cyclones did not impede a normal summer year melt as much as imagined. Except for the famous melt ponds:
"Caveat" model estimation of melt ponds, as found on Neven's best sea ice site in the world, truly bizarre, especially in the Alaska sector of the Pole, we have seen the ponds from space:
The greenish appearance of sea ice mid June, classic melt ponds colour, this is observed on the surface, a light green ice top world.
Beaufort sea had record heat temperatures reported. But here we find again a hint, the models calculate surface temperatures too cold. It turns out that I have found North of Alaska model surface air calculation too cold, a few weeks ago, I made an example of it in June... The model output was in violation of above sea ice refraction prime rule: surface air can't be colder than top of sea ice, especially applicable in summer! When ice is a heat sink.
Having been studying apparent illusions for years, it seems obvious that we are in for a greatest melt, despitesmoke and mirrors clouds/fog and ice. Its not that natural illusions are set to deceive, rather, belief in a conclusion far away from now, does that quite well. WD June 12, 2016 (few seconds before midnight)..
There is a lot of talk about how dominant Arctic Ocean winds, in some large part opposite to clockwise Arctic Ocean Gyre, "was not favourable" for compaction, gave a "lackluster performance" in June and therefore the melt season is basically "dull".... and especially melt ponds are not numerous. NASA ever so potent and a hugely positive force for correct science, projects
a large sea ice extent to remain Mid-September. But will that happen?
From here , we clearly observe that the Cyclones did not impede a normal summer year melt as much as imagined. Except for the famous melt ponds:
"Caveat" model estimation of melt ponds, as found on Neven's best sea ice site in the world, truly bizarre, especially in the Alaska sector of the Pole, we have seen the ponds from space:
The greenish appearance of sea ice mid June, classic melt ponds colour, this is observed on the surface, a light green ice top world.
Beaufort sea had record heat temperatures reported. But here we find again a hint, the models calculate surface temperatures too cold. It turns out that I have found North of Alaska model surface air calculation too cold, a few weeks ago, I made an example of it in June... The model output was in violation of above sea ice refraction prime rule: surface air can't be colder than top of sea ice, especially applicable in summer! When ice is a heat sink.
Having been studying apparent illusions for years, it seems obvious that we are in for a greatest melt, despite
Thursday, July 7, 2016
Sea Ice survival last defence: Clouds and Cyclone friendly open water
~2013 like Gyre stall possible but 2016 July icescape not at all like 2013.
What was hiding under the latest stable cyclone at about the Pole? A sea water with broken pack ice mix much greater than 2013. same date 82 N 150 E. 2016 has severely less ice, its good for cloudy Cyclones.
April 2016 EH2r projection called for a June July High pressure centred about the Pole, this is happening now, but had a real hard time establishing itself. Since June, Atlantic and Pacific Cyclones constantly penetrated the Arctic Ocean region. There is only one reason for that, open water, especially mixed with broken sea ice. There is a heat engine complex, in particular next to more consolidated ice from the Pole to North American side of Arctic, which is where the Anticyclones have a chance to last. But the Arctic North American Arctic Quadrant sea ice has a problem, more snow fell over it during the winter, due to winter 2015-16 dominant circulation pattern, North Atlantic moisture shed itself there . As you might have read, more snow is a twin edged sword, it protects sea ice in spring, but also slows down accretion appreciably over the winter. The pressure dipole now forming between Canadian Arctic Archipelago (more ice) and North of Siberia (less ice) will dominate this period for a while, until the weaker state of sea ice, on the Canadian side of Pole, will reveal itself after the protective snow cover vanishes completely.WD July 7, 2016
What was hiding under the latest stable cyclone at about the Pole? A sea water with broken pack ice mix much greater than 2013. same date 82 N 150 E. 2016 has severely less ice, its good for cloudy Cyclones.
April 2016 EH2r projection called for a June July High pressure centred about the Pole, this is happening now, but had a real hard time establishing itself. Since June, Atlantic and Pacific Cyclones constantly penetrated the Arctic Ocean region. There is only one reason for that, open water, especially mixed with broken sea ice. There is a heat engine complex, in particular next to more consolidated ice from the Pole to North American side of Arctic, which is where the Anticyclones have a chance to last. But the Arctic North American Arctic Quadrant sea ice has a problem, more snow fell over it during the winter, due to winter 2015-16 dominant circulation pattern, North Atlantic moisture shed itself there . As you might have read, more snow is a twin edged sword, it protects sea ice in spring, but also slows down accretion appreciably over the winter. The pressure dipole now forming between Canadian Arctic Archipelago (more ice) and North of Siberia (less ice) will dominate this period for a while, until the weaker state of sea ice, on the Canadian side of Pole, will reveal itself after the protective snow cover vanishes completely.WD July 7, 2016
Monday, July 4, 2016
Sea ice affected by a lot of snow, THE END story
~Not to forget tidal action
NASA EOSDIS Barrow Strait rapid sea ice disintegration (June 29-July 3, 2016), notice the greyish looking capture pre and post breaking sea ice. That is the colour of thin sea ice, finally revealed by most of the snow melted or sublimated. It broke likely on about June 30 July 1. What is so special about that date? It is a few days before the new moon, a very potent time for stronger tidal driven sea current. This GIF animation demonstrates 2 major players, greater than normal snowfall created this ice earlier, and now despite being thinner, the snow preserved it to last a bit later. But Barrow Strait ice was terribly vulnerable, and a mere extra tidal current took care of it quite well with ease. The larger image provided by NASA allows us to hunt for similar looking ice on EOSDIS whenever available by cloud clearings, the "grey ice of doom" can be seen pretty much everywhere. None so clearer in the Canadian High Arctic at this time.WD July 4th, 2016
Thursday, June 30, 2016
Effects of greater snowfall are lasting in some regions.
Lets focus on the Eastern NW passage where there was more snowfall:
What happens with more snowfall has long lasting implications for sea ice. First we have greater cooling of top of sea when it falls in autumn, the snow floats doesn't melt, acts like a proxy ice cover, and accelerates the grey ice sea ice genesis. This creates more rapid onset of fast ice. Now, lets fast forward to its effect to this early summer, many months later from October-November just past. EOSDIS
pictures of June 29, 2015 and 16 are marked upper left corner. But the great deal of snow during winter of 2015-16 affected sea ice morphology, and therefore its current cooler summer weather.
Look carefully where the snow remains in 2016 and you will inherently find more sea ice, because snow help made it, and also created a buffer slowing its melt. But the larger implication is the local early summer weather snow and greater sea ice extent created, cooler, and also strangely but so, thinner sea ice. Winds of 2015 in the same area as on this GIF animation were dry, there was less snowfall, which happened more on the western European side of the Arctic which happens to have far less sea ice extent on its coastal shores. 2015 sea ice eventually became thicker when formed, but open water Polynyas in 2015 were much larger because there was a great deal of wind from the North (not unusual) keeping top of sea water from forming ice . In late spring 2015, the land warmed quicker, local weather was equally warmer and residual July snow footprint far lesser. WD June 30,2016
Tuesday, June 28, 2016
Near North Pole current Ice condition, between a rock frozen ice and a cloudy cooler place.
June 28,2016, near North Pole ice conditions show "pancakes" typical of fluid sea ice, terribly broken up. Very little sign of old ice. But there was extensive compression during the Spring just past, this can be its undoing, a strong consolidated pack cools the air more, good spawning ground for Highs.
June 30 2013, same location, offered a glimpse on the damaged caused in 2012 melt. However,
the degree of open water caused by much thinner sea ice triggered what many contrarians deemed incorrectly "a cooling" especially at minima mid September 2013, because substantially less ice apparently melted, not so, it was an extent calculation 15% problem. This open water caused extensive Lows to penetrate and remain over the ice Pack throughout the summer. Current situation in 2016 seems between a strong consolidated pack and a loose Cyclone-genesis driven summer. The danger for 2016 sea ice is for less clouds to form at this time, un-likewise 2013, this is very possible. WD June 28 2016
June 30 2013, same location, offered a glimpse on the damaged caused in 2012 melt. However,
the degree of open water caused by much thinner sea ice triggered what many contrarians deemed incorrectly "a cooling" especially at minima mid September 2013, because substantially less ice apparently melted, not so, it was an extent calculation 15% problem. This open water caused extensive Lows to penetrate and remain over the ice Pack throughout the summer. Current situation in 2016 seems between a strong consolidated pack and a loose Cyclone-genesis driven summer. The danger for 2016 sea ice is for less clouds to form at this time, un-likewise 2013, this is very possible. WD June 28 2016
Monday, June 27, 2016
Despite contrarian winds, Beaufort Gyre current is still very strong
NASA EOSDIS 11 days of June 2016 selected at about 2 or 3 day intervals. You can see cyclones moving through along with contrarian winds, there were quite a few small cyclones hanging about during the same period. But nothing , literally nothing stopped the surface current moving the ice clockwise. This is explainable by 3 of many sea ice displacement vectors. The coriolis effect, note its not a force, sea ice momentum movement (a seldom discussed displacement vector) and finally the Beaufort Gyre itself, reinvigorated by months of clockwise circulation of mixed aged pack ice. This implies any lull in winds will cause compaction to occur nevertheless. wd June 27 2016.
Tuesday, June 7, 2016
The models may be calculating the sea ice surface to air interface temperatures incorrectly
~ Some surface buoys corroborate the prime horizon refraction rule
Having dealt before with doubtful calculations output by NOAA NCAR/NCEP with respect to top sea ice temperature, it seems suspicion confirmed by remote weather stations placed on sea ice. The ice core temperature minimum of 2015f (82 N 147 W) in particular on June 5 was really cold with lowest sun position, but as usual, solar radiation whacked out any precision with top thermistors most times, leaving us with only its average surface temperature to contemplate. It was -4.8 C for that day. At the same location NCAR/NCEP calculated -3. Now consider that an actual measurement can be done from space, the skin temperature or ice surface, it should be quite precise. NCAR/NCEP result was between -1 and 0 C. However, this is a violation of sea ice refraction prime rule, top of sea ice was never observed warmer than surface air. To cap this off, 2015f reported 12:00 UTC surface temperature at -7.39 C, now we turn to nearby sea ice surface weather stations at 12:00 UTC 80 N 110 W read -1, 76 N 160 W read -2. Welcome to the world of metric confusion, when temperatures seem really irregular. Another surface Auto station on Prince Patrick Island reported a more probable -7 (76 N 120 W).
To make sense of all this, one must weed out possible errors, to play it safe, only 2015f surface measurements seem accurate along with surface temperature from land based auto station. Why so? Because thermistor 2, likely in ice, recorded -6.7 C at 12 UTC, with a low sun solar radiation corruption. Later, the morning less bombarded with photons thermistor shoots up 5 C in 8 hours with higher sun. 2015f reported surface temp -2.9 C at 20:00 UTC while same colder morning thermistor reported +0.17 C, one would expect similar rise in temperature between surface and top of sea ice, but sea ice gained more degrees than surface measurement, again highly unlikely since sea ice and snow have very strong albedo, unless of course there is water on the said thermistor surrounded by sea ice.
No wonder Arctic models have trouble being precise, there is very little accurate observations to compare their output with.
June 5 1200 UTC CMC surface analysis.
Having dealt before with doubtful calculations output by NOAA NCAR/NCEP with respect to top sea ice temperature, it seems suspicion confirmed by remote weather stations placed on sea ice. The ice core temperature minimum of 2015f (82 N 147 W) in particular on June 5 was really cold with lowest sun position, but as usual, solar radiation whacked out any precision with top thermistors most times, leaving us with only its average surface temperature to contemplate. It was -4.8 C for that day. At the same location NCAR/NCEP calculated -3. Now consider that an actual measurement can be done from space, the skin temperature or ice surface, it should be quite precise. NCAR/NCEP result was between -1 and 0 C. However, this is a violation of sea ice refraction prime rule, top of sea ice was never observed warmer than surface air. To cap this off, 2015f reported 12:00 UTC surface temperature at -7.39 C, now we turn to nearby sea ice surface weather stations at 12:00 UTC 80 N 110 W read -1, 76 N 160 W read -2. Welcome to the world of metric confusion, when temperatures seem really irregular. Another surface Auto station on Prince Patrick Island reported a more probable -7 (76 N 120 W).
To make sense of all this, one must weed out possible errors, to play it safe, only 2015f surface measurements seem accurate along with surface temperature from land based auto station. Why so? Because thermistor 2, likely in ice, recorded -6.7 C at 12 UTC, with a low sun solar radiation corruption. Later, the morning less bombarded with photons thermistor shoots up 5 C in 8 hours with higher sun. 2015f reported surface temp -2.9 C at 20:00 UTC while same colder morning thermistor reported +0.17 C, one would expect similar rise in temperature between surface and top of sea ice, but sea ice gained more degrees than surface measurement, again highly unlikely since sea ice and snow have very strong albedo, unless of course there is water on the said thermistor surrounded by sea ice.
No wonder Arctic models have trouble being precise, there is very little accurate observations to compare their output with.
June 5 1200 UTC CMC surface analysis.
Sunday, June 5, 2016
Sometimes Top and bottom Melting looks like this
At onset of top melting the horizon appears slightly jagged, water is setting on top of sea ice. The ice core is very warmed yet colder than the air, the horizon is slightly above astronomical horizon, but the new surface water brings it down. wd June 5 ,2016
Sunday, May 29, 2016
2nd remarkable retreat front
~ Early Great Blue gaining on sea ice not only for Beaufort sea
Post news:
Post news:
June 14 EOSDIS, the 2nd melt front appears to have filled with loose pack sea ice spread out because temperatures have warmed much further. Consolidation lost, sometimes extent values may give a false idea about current sea ice action. Make no mistakes in judgement, this is the greatest melt in history. It comes with scattering of loose ice, from that point, greater clouds are possible, although not lasting because air temperatures are too warm. WD June 14,2016
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)