Monday, June 27, 2016
Despite contrarian winds, Beaufort Gyre current is still very strong
Tuesday, June 7, 2016
The models may be calculating the sea ice surface to air interface temperatures incorrectly
~ Some surface buoys corroborate the prime horizon refraction rule
Having dealt before with doubtful calculations output by NOAA NCAR/NCEP with respect to top sea ice temperature, it seems suspicion confirmed by remote weather stations placed on sea ice. The ice core temperature minimum of 2015f (82 N 147 W) in particular on June 5 was really cold with lowest sun position, but as usual, solar radiation whacked out any precision with top thermistors most times, leaving us with only its average surface temperature to contemplate. It was -4.8 C for that day. At the same location NCAR/NCEP calculated -3. Now consider that an actual measurement can be done from space, the skin temperature or ice surface, it should be quite precise. NCAR/NCEP result was between -1 and 0 C. However, this is a violation of sea ice refraction prime rule, top of sea ice was never observed warmer than surface air. To cap this off, 2015f reported 12:00 UTC surface temperature at -7.39 C, now we turn to nearby sea ice surface weather stations at 12:00 UTC 80 N 110 W read -1, 76 N 160 W read -2. Welcome to the world of metric confusion, when temperatures seem really irregular. Another surface Auto station on Prince Patrick Island reported a more probable -7 (76 N 120 W).
To make sense of all this, one must weed out possible errors, to play it safe, only 2015f surface measurements seem accurate along with surface temperature from land based auto station. Why so? Because thermistor 2, likely in ice, recorded -6.7 C at 12 UTC, with a low sun solar radiation corruption. Later, the morning less bombarded with photons thermistor shoots up 5 C in 8 hours with higher sun. 2015f reported surface temp -2.9 C at 20:00 UTC while same colder morning thermistor reported +0.17 C, one would expect similar rise in temperature between surface and top of sea ice, but sea ice gained more degrees than surface measurement, again highly unlikely since sea ice and snow have very strong albedo, unless of course there is water on the said thermistor surrounded by sea ice.
No wonder Arctic models have trouble being precise, there is very little accurate observations to compare their output with.
June 5 1200 UTC CMC surface analysis.
Having dealt before with doubtful calculations output by NOAA NCAR/NCEP with respect to top sea ice temperature, it seems suspicion confirmed by remote weather stations placed on sea ice. The ice core temperature minimum of 2015f (82 N 147 W) in particular on June 5 was really cold with lowest sun position, but as usual, solar radiation whacked out any precision with top thermistors most times, leaving us with only its average surface temperature to contemplate. It was -4.8 C for that day. At the same location NCAR/NCEP calculated -3. Now consider that an actual measurement can be done from space, the skin temperature or ice surface, it should be quite precise. NCAR/NCEP result was between -1 and 0 C. However, this is a violation of sea ice refraction prime rule, top of sea ice was never observed warmer than surface air. To cap this off, 2015f reported 12:00 UTC surface temperature at -7.39 C, now we turn to nearby sea ice surface weather stations at 12:00 UTC 80 N 110 W read -1, 76 N 160 W read -2. Welcome to the world of metric confusion, when temperatures seem really irregular. Another surface Auto station on Prince Patrick Island reported a more probable -7 (76 N 120 W).
To make sense of all this, one must weed out possible errors, to play it safe, only 2015f surface measurements seem accurate along with surface temperature from land based auto station. Why so? Because thermistor 2, likely in ice, recorded -6.7 C at 12 UTC, with a low sun solar radiation corruption. Later, the morning less bombarded with photons thermistor shoots up 5 C in 8 hours with higher sun. 2015f reported surface temp -2.9 C at 20:00 UTC while same colder morning thermistor reported +0.17 C, one would expect similar rise in temperature between surface and top of sea ice, but sea ice gained more degrees than surface measurement, again highly unlikely since sea ice and snow have very strong albedo, unless of course there is water on the said thermistor surrounded by sea ice.
No wonder Arctic models have trouble being precise, there is very little accurate observations to compare their output with.
 | |
| NOAA surface skin analysis, apparently the sea ice average temperature was warmer than the surface air over most locations. Mass Buoy 2012f recorded an average surface temperature -4.8 C, 3 degrees colder than model skin temperature calculation. |
 | |
| The daily average surface temperature of about -3 C over Beaufort Gyre was 2 C colder than top of sea ice "skin" average which is in violation of refraction prime rule. In this example, the adiabatic lapse rate between top of ice and surface measurement is a mere 1000 C/Km, the stuff of road asphalt. 2015f same day average surface temperature was about 2 C colder. In somewhere lies a geophysical modelling algorithm error. WD June7,2016 |
Sunday, June 5, 2016
Sometimes Top and bottom Melting looks like this
Sunday, May 29, 2016
2nd remarkable retreat front
~ Early Great Blue gaining on sea ice not only for Beaufort sea
Post news:
 |
| Sea ice loss North of Franz Josef lands top, more than 100 km between May 17 and May 29 2016, May 17 is the photo with less sea ice. Courtesy NASA EOSDIS The apparent Northwards expansion of the North Atlantic is really the drift of the the entire sea ice pack towards Fram Strait (bottom left). What is unusual may be judged by sea ice fluidity, mobility or lack of cohesion, entirely due to warmer temperatures and the collapse of thinner sea ice , usually the "glue" slowing or keeping the pack more consolidated. This sort of movement always normally occurs in August or late July. DMI 80 North data can thus be affected by necessarily warmer air gaining a greater area North of 80 degrees latitude:  This graph may indicate a larger colder area over the main pack, the more open water changes the over all analysis. It would be preferable to have a similar Graph covering surface temperatures 85 latitude Northwards. WD May 29, 2016. |
Post news:
June 14 EOSDIS, the 2nd melt front appears to have filled with loose pack sea ice spread out because temperatures have warmed much further. Consolidation lost, sometimes extent values may give a false idea about current sea ice action. Make no mistakes in judgement, this is the greatest melt in history. It comes with scattering of loose ice, from that point, greater clouds are possible, although not lasting because air temperatures are too warm. WD June 14,2016
Friday, May 20, 2016
No sea ice horizon upwards rebound observed close to Midnight sun
~Optical Thermal observation method further explained, proving Ti<=Ta
~Likely 24 hour bottom melt earliest captured....
Preceding article questioning NCAR calculations can be seen here. The sea ice Horizon would
drop below Astronomical Horizon (AH) if top of sea ice was warmer than surface air. In many years of observations it was never observed doing that, the much lower sea water horizon observations with colder than sst air were never repeated with ice. Instead spring sea ice horizons maintain AH until evening or until under sea ice melting is 24 hours a day. This likely happened yesterday, South Cornwallis Island looking at westward MW Passage.
On a given Arctic spring day, the horizon drops to AH when the air temperature Ta is equal to top of sea ice temperature Ti. When reaching AH, it is highly likely that the bottom of sea ice melts,
but during spring the AH horizon lasts a few minutes when it first shows, in March or early April, so accretion keeps on making net gains. AH horizons gradually become longer, but when AH is maintained more than 12 hours, the bottom of sea ice melts more than forms, net bottom melting occurs. This has happened yesterday, when AH was observed 1 hour before the midnight sun. For the first time I have observed this in May, this makes Spring 2016 fast ice the weakest heat resisting sea ice observed since 2010 when spring observations have started.
~Likely 24 hour bottom melt earliest captured....
Preceding article questioning NCAR calculations can be seen here. The sea ice Horizon would
drop below Astronomical Horizon (AH) if top of sea ice was warmer than surface air. In many years of observations it was never observed doing that, the much lower sea water horizon observations with colder than sst air were never repeated with ice. Instead spring sea ice horizons maintain AH until evening or until under sea ice melting is 24 hours a day. This likely happened yesterday, South Cornwallis Island looking at westward MW Passage.
 |
| May 19 2014-2015-2016 Horizon comparisons (left center right). 2016 was taken 40 minutes later same date, but with horizon at AH. While 2014 and 15 rose above and kept on rising, despite cloudy conditions, whiter streaks are breaks in clouds sun ray reflections. The rising horizon 2014-15 was created by cooling of air accelerated by minima top of sea ice core temperature. 2016 core appears warmer, if not significantly out of cooling potential. |
On a given Arctic spring day, the horizon drops to AH when the air temperature Ta is equal to top of sea ice temperature Ti. When reaching AH, it is highly likely that the bottom of sea ice melts,
but during spring the AH horizon lasts a few minutes when it first shows, in March or early April, so accretion keeps on making net gains. AH horizons gradually become longer, but when AH is maintained more than 12 hours, the bottom of sea ice melts more than forms, net bottom melting occurs. This has happened yesterday, when AH was observed 1 hour before the midnight sun. For the first time I have observed this in May, this makes Spring 2016 fast ice the weakest heat resisting sea ice observed since 2010 when spring observations have started.
 |
| While taken at same evening time, the same 19 May Ice horizon appeared at different altitudes. 2015 (left) kept rebounding upwards, while 2016 remained steady so 1 hour prior the midnight sun. Sea ice bottom accretion has stopped in 2016, and now bottom daily melting has started.
These key observations capture the very thermal structures instantaneously. Its all about sea ice temperatures affecting the air right above, with of course radiation forcing, when the sun gets through. wd May 20,2016
|
Thursday, May 19, 2016
Optically unlikely not possible remote sensing/model? measurements/calculations
85 to 90 N NOAA Reanalysis. May 16, 2016. Use the mouse pointer to compare surface and top of sea ice temperatures.
There are several reasons why surface sea ice temperature can't be warmer than surface air. #1 It is optically not observable, if there is a steep adiabatic profile from ground/ice temperature to Surface air 2 meters above, it would give an optical illusion, similar to hot road mirages. We have here on this example given many locations with a 2 degree C temperature difference between skin to surface air. This would give a lapse rate 100 times more than the normal 10 C/Km. #2 Thermally improbable. Top of sea ice temperature influences the surface air temperature, if the air is colder than top of sea ice, this is a very unstable thermal structure, ice would cool rapidly by convection upwards of the air touching it. While air warmer than sea ice invokes a normal stable thermal structure. Because ice/snow surface is white, especially since thermal conduction from lower in the column sea ice is much greater than air to top of ice, air conduction affects top of sea ice less than colder sea ice column core minima, very necessarily at this time of late spring. #3 clouds. Likely covering 85N to the Pole here, clouds offer a more neutral thermal flux balance, whereas there is a steady equal heat flux up and down at the surface to air interface. The net result is more of an isotherm, but still slightly favoring the stable thermal structure, which is colder top of sea ice than surface air. WD May 19, 2016
Saturday, May 7, 2016
Remote sensing VS Refraction Prime sea ice rule. Satellites are pretty good, but refraction observations are better.
~Ta>=Ti rule holds well as seen from space
~ Is likely some remote sensing calculations/methods need some adjustments.
Taking advantage of persistent "Big Blue" of 2016 spring, a truly remarkable insolation bombardment , the right term "relentless" onslaught of sunshine, we can check and find if refraction gained insights (written here) are true on a planetary scale. NOAA daily climate composites are very good, so we look at its sea surface temperature setting or "surface skin" temperatures VS surface temperatures.
NOAA May 4 2016. Daily meansurface temperatures "1000 mb" temperatures are too cold in East Siberian and North Barents seas, North of Ellesmere and Greenland surface air 1000 mb is largely too cold. There is a strange North of Wrangel Island surface air cold area spot and also compared to entire Chukchi Sea surface temperatures. Basically if I am correct, Remote Sensing surface temps algorithms daily means appear to have a mixing problem with land features. Note Surface temperature 1000 mb Ta is indeed always warmer than top of ice Ti well away from land.
Click on GIF image to expand and use your mouse pointer to make comparisons.
If there is a calculation error with NOAA surface temperatures, it would be "averaged out" eventually because Ta>=Ti , a fact gained by multiple horizon observations, this feature will show up over a longer term:
NOAA May 1-5 2016. Composite mean makes it much harder to findSurface air 1000 mb air colder than top of sea ice. The North of Wrangel Island temperature anomaly most likely was from thicker sea ice pressure height temperature difference. Although, North Barents Sea has still a smaller area of colder air especially East of Franz Josef Islands.
Hypothetically, the longer we average out the likely Algorithm error, the more impossible it would be to find Ta < Ti.
March 1 to May 5 2016, literally impossible to find top of sea ice temperature
warmer than surface air 1000 mb temperature.
NOAA surface temperature looks better but still has small daily flaws.
May 9, 2016 NOAA daily composites offer surface air temperature feature which performs slightly better than 1000 mb, if you click on extreme cold surface air temperature near land it will be likely erroneous, making surface air colder than ice. Which has never been observed optically.
Likewise looking back longer term:
April 9-May 9 average If you find a spot where Ta< Ti , let me know. There are none I can find.
In short:
NOAA remote sensing temperatures are quite good, but I would look at every case when
sea ice is warmer than surface air, double check the calculations and the physics. I don't know if this is the error which causes sea ice models to err in making good melt projections. A 4 C warmer sea ice than surface temperature (Chukchi anomaly very top GIF above) would make the horizon extremely low and that has never been observed, on top of the underlying thermal physics which would be hard to explain. WD May 7 and May 11, 2016
~ Is likely some remote sensing calculations/methods need some adjustments.
Taking advantage of persistent "Big Blue" of 2016 spring, a truly remarkable insolation bombardment , the right term "relentless" onslaught of sunshine, we can check and find if refraction gained insights (written here) are true on a planetary scale. NOAA daily climate composites are very good, so we look at its sea surface temperature setting or "surface skin" temperatures VS surface temperatures.
NOAA May 4 2016. Daily mean
Click on GIF image to expand and use your mouse pointer to make comparisons.
If there is a calculation error with NOAA surface temperatures, it would be "averaged out" eventually because Ta>=Ti , a fact gained by multiple horizon observations, this feature will show up over a longer term:
NOAA May 1-5 2016. Composite mean makes it much harder to find
Hypothetically, the longer we average out the likely Algorithm error, the more impossible it would be to find Ta < Ti.
March 1 to May 5 2016, literally impossible to find top of sea ice temperature
warmer than
NOAA surface temperature looks better but still has small daily flaws.
May 9, 2016 NOAA daily composites offer surface air temperature feature which performs slightly better than 1000 mb, if you click on extreme cold surface air temperature near land it will be likely erroneous, making surface air colder than ice. Which has never been observed optically.
Likewise looking back longer term:
April 9-May 9 average If you find a spot where Ta< Ti , let me know. There are none I can find.
In short:
NOAA remote sensing temperatures are quite good, but I would look at every case when
sea ice is warmer than surface air, double check the calculations and the physics. I don't know if this is the error which causes sea ice models to err in making good melt projections. A 4 C warmer sea ice than surface temperature (Chukchi anomaly very top GIF above) would make the horizon extremely low and that has never been observed, on top of the underlying thermal physics which would be hard to explain. WD May 7 and May 11, 2016
Thursday, April 28, 2016
Sea ice refraction prime rule: top of sea ice is always colder or equal to surface air temperature
~Putting the proposed sea ice optical theory to the test
~Even when some part of sea ice column is always warmer than air (during winter).
~Sea ice horizon never been observed below Astronomical Horizon has now an explanation.
The best way to sum up horizon refraction throughout the Arctic Ocean year is by this sketch once posted here:
Strictly by several years of observations, a visual correlation was made with temperature profiles from sea water to upper air related to physical conditions of the horizon. Notice top of sea ice temperature was never observed warmer than the air immediately above. Only with the presence of sea water does the horizon elevation drop below the "Astronomical Horizon" ( orange line). The Astronomical Horizon of any planet Earth location would permanently remain at the same unchangeable altitude if our planet did not have an atmosphere.
Many years of sea ice horizon observations gave a proposed theory written here and here.
The biggest feature of sea ice horizons happens when the sea ice horizon stops going down, does not go below the Astronomical Horizon, settles there until the sun lowers in the sky to set, only to spring up higher again. Its the spring time great steady "LAN" horizon which may happen daily for a while after Local Apparent Noon. When so, the temperature profile at interface between ice and air temperature is isothermal. This feature also makes it possible for well informed sea Navigators to recognize the presence of sea ice without radars.
Sea ice Buoys offer proof, despite their near or above ice thermistor problems. Selecting a thermistor embedded in top of ice usually should give good results, so without further a do, lets use 2015 F at thermistor T5 (50 cm down from top of thermistor string):
If top of sea ice was always warmer than air, there should be a permanently very low sea ice horizon. This does not happen, not only because of upward thermal heat flux from sea which warms the lowest atmosphere causing a near surface inversion or a well above upper air temperature profile maxima. The dark season thermal flux is stronger nearer to ice, but there is an inversion right above, something cools the surface to air interface. It is wonderfully complicated. Heat Capacity of sea ice and snow is twice more than air. Thermal Capacitance plays a role, Heat Conductivity and especially insulation properties of sea ice are very important. Eventually, the combination of properties cause top of the ice always colder than air, as may be seen on your own house:
Physics replicates itself with different matter, in this case house insulation. Note in blue, top of insulation is always colder or equal than air except when too sunny. Consider sea ice as insulation, the same happens over the frozen sea. But also again identical with middle of sea ice column as with buoy 2015f graph above, center of insulation layer is almost always warmer than air, this is a good model proxy presentation for sea ice.
As observed optically following Local Apparent Noon (LAN) with the sun present, the temperature lapse rate of the surface to air interface appears to become isothermal over sea ice, the horizon is at the Astronomical Horizon. Considering an hypothetical, if top of sea ice would remain cold, unaffected by shortwave radiation, the horizon would remain higher than Astronomical Horizon.
Finding a Buoy replicating the house insulation graph would be great. However, there is a problem with sea ice buoys, they seem affected by sun rays, and there is few other considerations to take, the exact position of the thermistor matters, the coldest layer may be at a certain height not always placed with a thermistor. Lets try to idealize a true measurement of top of sea ice as much as possible (or in the snow layer next to it). The only way around is to find measurements in darkness, away from sun rays affecting the thermistor, lets try close to the North Pole Buoy 2015l:
In Darkness 4 hr interval readings 2015l November 1 to 8 2015 1st thermistor called 31 (in blue) is always colder than surface air (in red).
2015l December 1-7 2015, always colder or equal. Top thermistor wonderfully matches optical physics observations well in darkness or spring. Likewise, I have filmed in darkness no ice horizons very close to astronomical horizon as in spring, the warming of surface to air interface occurs rarely during the long Polar night.
2015l January 1-7 2016, the data is overwhelming, top of sea ice is always colder or equal to surface air. [Or perhaps inside snow next to ice, but snow sensor did not seem operational].
Sun presence might have affected a few readings, 2015l September 22-29 2015
Top of sea ice is always colder or equal than surface air, this is a profound conclusion from refraction observations. Adding a better view of the complexity of sea ice thermal physics. WD April 28 ,2016.
~Even when some part of sea ice column is always warmer than air (during winter).
~Sea ice horizon never been observed below Astronomical Horizon has now an explanation.
The best way to sum up horizon refraction throughout the Arctic Ocean year is by this sketch once posted here:
Strictly by several years of observations, a visual correlation was made with temperature profiles from sea water to upper air related to physical conditions of the horizon. Notice top of sea ice temperature was never observed warmer than the air immediately above. Only with the presence of sea water does the horizon elevation drop below the "Astronomical Horizon" ( orange line). The Astronomical Horizon of any planet Earth location would permanently remain at the same unchangeable altitude if our planet did not have an atmosphere.
Many years of sea ice horizon observations gave a proposed theory written here and here.
The biggest feature of sea ice horizons happens when the sea ice horizon stops going down, does not go below the Astronomical Horizon, settles there until the sun lowers in the sky to set, only to spring up higher again. Its the spring time great steady "LAN" horizon which may happen daily for a while after Local Apparent Noon. When so, the temperature profile at interface between ice and air temperature is isothermal. This feature also makes it possible for well informed sea Navigators to recognize the presence of sea ice without radars.
Sea ice Buoys offer proof, despite their near or above ice thermistor problems. Selecting a thermistor embedded in top of ice usually should give good results, so without further a do, lets use 2015 F at thermistor T5 (50 cm down from top of thermistor string):
 |
| Buoy 2015F August 13, 2015 to April 19 2016, 4 hour interval surface temperature (in blue) Thermistor 5 (in red 50 cm down). Temperature of sea ice was always Greater or Equal to surface air, except for a few very rare interesting occasions. |
If top of sea ice was always warmer than air, there should be a permanently very low sea ice horizon. This does not happen, not only because of upward thermal heat flux from sea which warms the lowest atmosphere causing a near surface inversion or a well above upper air temperature profile maxima. The dark season thermal flux is stronger nearer to ice, but there is an inversion right above, something cools the surface to air interface. It is wonderfully complicated. Heat Capacity of sea ice and snow is twice more than air. Thermal Capacitance plays a role, Heat Conductivity and especially insulation properties of sea ice are very important. Eventually, the combination of properties cause top of the ice always colder than air, as may be seen on your own house:
Physics replicates itself with different matter, in this case house insulation. Note in blue, top of insulation is always colder or equal than air except when too sunny. Consider sea ice as insulation, the same happens over the frozen sea. But also again identical with middle of sea ice column as with buoy 2015f graph above, center of insulation layer is almost always warmer than air, this is a good model proxy presentation for sea ice.
As observed optically following Local Apparent Noon (LAN) with the sun present, the temperature lapse rate of the surface to air interface appears to become isothermal over sea ice, the horizon is at the Astronomical Horizon. Considering an hypothetical, if top of sea ice would remain cold, unaffected by shortwave radiation, the horizon would remain higher than Astronomical Horizon.
Finding a Buoy replicating the house insulation graph would be great. However, there is a problem with sea ice buoys, they seem affected by sun rays, and there is few other considerations to take, the exact position of the thermistor matters, the coldest layer may be at a certain height not always placed with a thermistor. Lets try to idealize a true measurement of top of sea ice as much as possible (or in the snow layer next to it). The only way around is to find measurements in darkness, away from sun rays affecting the thermistor, lets try close to the North Pole Buoy 2015l:
In Darkness 4 hr interval readings 2015l November 1 to 8 2015 1st thermistor called 31 (in blue) is always colder than surface air (in red).
2015l December 1-7 2015, always colder or equal. Top thermistor wonderfully matches optical physics observations well in darkness or spring. Likewise, I have filmed in darkness no ice horizons very close to astronomical horizon as in spring, the warming of surface to air interface occurs rarely during the long Polar night.
2015l January 1-7 2016, the data is overwhelming, top of sea ice is always colder or equal to surface air. [Or perhaps inside snow next to ice, but snow sensor did not seem operational].
Sun presence might have affected a few readings, 2015l September 22-29 2015
Top of sea ice is always colder or equal than surface air, this is a profound conclusion from refraction observations. Adding a better view of the complexity of sea ice thermal physics. WD April 28 ,2016.
Saturday, April 23, 2016
2016 annual spring projection, made by sun disk observations and otherwise unorthodox means
~ Northern Hemisphere collapsing cold atmosphere
~ ENSO plays weather maker along with dwindling sea ice extent
~ Extra 2015-16 snowfall a major role in twisting jet stream
~ 2016 warmest consecutive year in history known since beginning of March, but not official till January 2017
~ 2008 Big Blue repeat, cloud seeding theory confirmed yet again.
The sun is of course a giant thermometer, not only a source of energy. Notice apparent lack of sunspots didn't cool anything though.
Arctic deflated sun as seen through many atmospheres. The sun and Earth atmosphere are telling how hot it is anywhere on our planet. The same sun taken in the tropics at the same altitude would look a whole lot rounder.
Rare near dead center lone sunspot is the signature event of this spring. Can you tell which suns as posted above were upright?
NOAA essentially confirmed the large warming of the stratosphere which was seen as unbelievable sun disk expansions, especially with sun shots captured at higher elevations. The latest bit of cooling was equally caught recently with the sun returning to more normal vertical diameters.
The upper troposphere and stratosphere accounts to about 40% of sun disk refraction.
Arctic
General circulation projections:
June July:
2 CTNP left with the largest wobbling like a top over the Canadian Arctic Archipelago. The Jet stream more or less similar to spring fading away along where the coldest land of sea surfaces are.
Recap:
Consider 3 large geophysical events, very strong El-Nino quickly replaced by La-Nina, the apparent vanishing clouds and a much warmed cloudy winter preceding a cloudless spring. Top this with a huge chunk of sea ice melted once again and 2016 should be remembered as a wonderful hot summer where most people live, especially for those appreciating heat waves, but a disaster where the climatic systems are particularly vulnerable. The weather weirdness factor will thus increase in ways not so kind to all. WD April 24 2016
~ ENSO plays weather maker along with dwindling sea ice extent
~ Extra 2015-16 snowfall a major role in twisting jet stream
~ 2016 warmest consecutive year in history known since beginning of March, but not official till January 2017
~ 2008 Big Blue repeat, cloud seeding theory confirmed yet again.
The sun is of course a giant thermometer, not only a source of energy. Notice apparent lack of sunspots didn't cool anything though. 
Arctic deflated sun as seen through many atmospheres. The sun and Earth atmosphere are telling how hot it is anywhere on our planet. The same sun taken in the tropics at the same altitude would look a whole lot rounder.
Rare near dead center lone sunspot is the signature event of this spring. Can you tell which suns as posted above were upright?
Annual coming summer/fall/winter projection:.
First the projection,
Because it is so
obvious, 2016 will be the warmest year
in history despite a forming LaNina. which is the most
lethal combination for the survival of the Arctic Ocean ice pack. Less North American tornados than average is
expected because of collapse of cold air in the higher atmosphere, despite it being very cold during January and
February just past. However there will be a return of
Hurricanes hitting North American shores. Rain for the west Coast of North America will resume to more normal
levels until September. Very hot
summer temperatures for the middle North
American continent will extend towards the entire East coast. NW Europe will be wet which makes it slightly cool, but drier cold fall. Eurasia and Western Russia super heat waves are expected.
The potential for
the North Pole to be sea ice free at Minima coming mid September has never been higher. Arctic sea ice extent will be smaller than all time lowest record of 2012. Clouds
will span less in all regions of the world favoring droughts and heat waves everywhere even where they don't usually occur.
Winter coming will be at first very warm, becoming bitterly cold in January, and so will the sea ice recover rapidly but with far less multi-year ice.
Prognosis:
End of
winter/early spring average vertical sun disk size comparisons ending April 21, 2016
What is the
score?
2016 is #1 at 15.45%.
#2 2015 at 11.82%
#3 [2005, 2006 and 2013] at 10%
#4 [2009, 2010, 2011] at 8.18%
5th place 2012 7.27 %.
6.7%
should be considered a normal year to year fluctuation of all time average vertical sun disk maximum dimensions.
Data from 110 vertical sun disk decimal
levels extending from -0.9 to +10.9 degrees elevations, including 540 observations, above normal year acquisition numbers due to no clouds currently continuing. With about 42 sun disk measurements per
degree elevation, each yearly vertical sun disk average is compared between years
2002 to 2016 inclusively (15 seasons).
What does this
mean? Vertical sun disks are expanded in
a tropical atmosphere as opposed to much compressed for a polar
atmosphere. If there is a warming of the atmosphere in the polar regions, vertical sun disks dimensions have to
expand. But not necessarily evenly at
all sun elevations. The truer measure of expansiveness is clearly depicted by
comparing vertical sun disk dimensions from year to year. Sun disks are another way of signaling over
all temperature trends of the entire atmosphere from 2 times its actual
vertical thickness to about 40 times. It is
the most precise depiction of warming since it incorporates huge atmospheric
distances, far more than any satellite or
possibly radars.
Year
2016 gave extraordinary results despite all time high levels of snow depth on sea ice and land surfaces. This snow dates back to October-November 2015. Laid out more than twice thick than
normal. As a good insulator, thicker snow depth kept permafrost warmer and
the sea ice thinner. It also made the
rising sun ineffective in warming surface air.
Despite more reflection to space, overall winter temperature averages
were above normal. Not by much, but
above average. Expanded sun disk dimensions mirrored the
state of the atmosphere up to where the deeper snow had an impact. All time average highest expansion averages occurred 12 times
between 10 to 5 degrees elevations and 4 times -1 to 4 degrees elevations. Moreover, the upper air above 5 degrees
elevation has had many, the most numerous ever, exploded sun disk sizes especially in the critically
usually very cold Northwest atmosphere from Southern Cornwallis Island
Nunavut Canada. The coldest high atmosphere
air seems to have collapsed or warmed substantially. This is a remarkable event and affects the outlook of coming weather everywhere over the Northern Hemisphere.
El-Nino event just
past was largely felt by more clouds during the entire Arctic long night.
Unlike central Arctic Archipelago, the larger Arctic was found to
be extremely warmed with large temperature anomalies easily more than 4 C in
many regions. ENSO reverted quickly
towards La-Nina lately. Replicating 2008 "big blue" event which was and consists numerous consecutive days without clouds. Interruptions of this years “big blue” was
only by encroaching cyclones, there are no substantial cooling cloud spans about. At season
end, mid
May, there should be nearly the same amount of sun disk observations
than during 2008. The 'big blue" event of 2008 had huge consequences
for water puddles over sea ice.
Optical to remote sensing Correlations:
The seen warming occurred at 250 mb covering almost exactly the Archipelago. But this was the same location where the coldest surface air persisted. Very much conducive to little clouds. A vertical temperature anomaly event from no clouds with deeper surface snow pack reflecting the gradually intensifying sun rays?
Where is summer cold Arctic air going to hang out?
The imminent collapse of the Alaska to North
Pole sector pack Ice will impact the jet stream. But there are other factors largely related
to current La-Nina trending. Cloud
seeding theory predicts less clouds for the Arctic when ENSO
turns towards La-Nina, as it has
already occurred, this favors
Anticyclone genesis as has happened
especially above the Arctic Ocean gyre area.
Mid-April onwards should usually be a very cloudy Arctic Ocean sky, characterized with hardly distinguishable geographic and pack ice lead features perceivable by satellite
photos. So far, this was not the
case, reinforcing again a cloud seeding theory largely correct. But note,
North Atlantic and Pacific Ocean
SST’s were cooled for a prolonged time period because of the same cloud seeding reason when El-Nino was full blast,
more clouds occurred over the Northern Oceans by enormous consecutive Polar Vortex cyclones. These cooler vast areas of sea water will have an important
impact just as well. Past winter circulation pattern of North Atlantic to Pole
cyclones favored a lot of moisture covering most of the Canadian Arctic Archipelago
Southwards. This same pattern likely
gave less snow for Central Northern
Eurasia, very unlike winter 2014-15 huge transcontinental pattern.
Again I split it in three distinct
periods:
April May:
3 distinct
Cold Temperature North Poles (CTNP) vortices
are expected. 2 will eventually
collapse and only one will remain at sea ice Minima. The current Arctic Dipole will largely remain
in place for 4 distinct reasons: Warm
winter continued to spring with temperature to dew
point ratio spread further apart, less
cloud coverage because La-Nina trends, mesoscale CTNP Polar vortices favor a High Pressure between them, with descending air above the Gyre High much warmer than normal.
Note the gyre High moving towards Russia mainly because of CTNP placement.
August September
Greenland largest ice with Ellesmere becomes the center of Cold teamed with what is left of pack ice , Cyclones now linger over the Beaufort Gyre. The big difference with last year is the diminished Polar jet stream not as high in latitude over the Pacific. I'd expect some major heat wave action North Eurasia along with great cyclone diversions NE american continent.
Sunday, April 3, 2016
Illusions and implications of a deeper Arctic snow layer
~Arctic surface snow depth turns out to be a very complex issue.
The very powerful El-Nino 2016 almost peaked at Christmas 2015, therefore according to
the cloud seeding theory, the Arctic was covered with clouds during the long night, and so it was, not only cloudy but snowy, in particular during October and November (El-Nino Maximum temp anomaly).
Snowfall was great, in some places multiple times the monthly average record. Ironically, ENSO driven heat causation making more snowfall created more sea ice extent than it would of otherwise. Snow spreads to open sea water either from sky or drifts, as it floats just below the sea surface, it doesn't melt since sea water is usually -1.8 C. This floating snow enables ice to form more quickly. Immersed snow is usually much colder than -2 C during Arctic winter.
However if greater snow layer covers sea ice, the snow insulates direct contact of air to ice, the more insulation there is, the less heat loss of sea water, accretion slows a great deal more.
In one case, snow helps create sea ice, in the other, it slows the build up of sea ice thickness.
Complexities continue especially in the spring time when the sun reappears after the long night.
After long night less ice fabrication because of greater snow insulation, the opposite occurs, the sun doesn't warm the ice just as much as it could with a lesser more Arctic normal snow layer. A melt stall occurs, and this has just happened. The latest maximum sea ice extent appears flat:
The warmer winter just past gave a less parabolic sea ice extent graph feature , the greater snowfall must have also flatlined the maximum extent.
There is also lesser melting of the thinner in ice blackish leads even with a full forced "big blue"
event outgoing at this time. Arctic big blue occurs when there is hardly any clouds for months, this usually happens when ENSO trends towards La-Nina.
EOSDIS april 1,2015 North of Beaufort sea appeared broken, with many blackish leads and fractures.
Although 2014-15 was a warm winter, this satellite photo of April 1, 2016 appears to suggest that the winter of 2015-16 was colder. But it wasn't. The illusion of less broken sea ice was done curtesy of greater snowfall and winds drifting snow on the sea ice more evenly.
Spring 2016 sea ice is over all thinner than 2015 all the way to the North Pole.
There are more features to the sea ice greater snow layer. Refraction wise, the horizon appears
usually higher at local apparent noon, but lower in the evening on most occasions. Sun rays
are not getting through to the ice as with a normal snow cover, and this affects the entire surface to air interface thermal physics of the Arctic with significantly more snow.
Finally this GIF animation compares the snow dilemma well:
Although there appears to be no graph available for snow on top of sea ice, this page here displays great snow cover anomalies on land next to the Arctic Ocean.
WD April 3, 2016
The very powerful El-Nino 2016 almost peaked at Christmas 2015, therefore according to
the cloud seeding theory, the Arctic was covered with clouds during the long night, and so it was, not only cloudy but snowy, in particular during October and November (El-Nino Maximum temp anomaly).
Snowfall was great, in some places multiple times the monthly average record. Ironically, ENSO driven heat causation making more snowfall created more sea ice extent than it would of otherwise. Snow spreads to open sea water either from sky or drifts, as it floats just below the sea surface, it doesn't melt since sea water is usually -1.8 C. This floating snow enables ice to form more quickly. Immersed snow is usually much colder than -2 C during Arctic winter.
However if greater snow layer covers sea ice, the snow insulates direct contact of air to ice, the more insulation there is, the less heat loss of sea water, accretion slows a great deal more.
In one case, snow helps create sea ice, in the other, it slows the build up of sea ice thickness.
Complexities continue especially in the spring time when the sun reappears after the long night.
After long night less ice fabrication because of greater snow insulation, the opposite occurs, the sun doesn't warm the ice just as much as it could with a lesser more Arctic normal snow layer. A melt stall occurs, and this has just happened. The latest maximum sea ice extent appears flat:
The warmer winter just past gave a less parabolic sea ice extent graph feature , the greater snowfall must have also flatlined the maximum extent.
There is also lesser melting of the thinner in ice blackish leads even with a full forced "big blue"
event outgoing at this time. Arctic big blue occurs when there is hardly any clouds for months, this usually happens when ENSO trends towards La-Nina.
EOSDIS april 1,2015 North of Beaufort sea appeared broken, with many blackish leads and fractures.
Although 2014-15 was a warm winter, this satellite photo of April 1, 2016 appears to suggest that the winter of 2015-16 was colder. But it wasn't. The illusion of less broken sea ice was done curtesy of greater snowfall and winds drifting snow on the sea ice more evenly.
Spring 2016 sea ice is over all thinner than 2015 all the way to the North Pole.
There are more features to the sea ice greater snow layer. Refraction wise, the horizon appears
usually higher at local apparent noon, but lower in the evening on most occasions. Sun rays
are not getting through to the ice as with a normal snow cover, and this affects the entire surface to air interface thermal physics of the Arctic with significantly more snow.
Finally this GIF animation compares the snow dilemma well:
Although there appears to be no graph available for snow on top of sea ice, this page here displays great snow cover anomalies on land next to the Arctic Ocean.
WD April 3, 2016
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)